Om media, islam og hykling!
Shoaib Sultan i Islamsk Råd Norge tar i Aftenposten 10.11 avstand fra vold mot kvinner, på tvers av egen religion.
Tekst:
Koranen og Hadith – Muhammeds tradisjon sanksjonerer vold mot og voldtekt av kvinner. Så lenge muslimer insisterer på at Koranen skal leses bokstavelig og ikke skal tolkes i en historisk kontekst, får de et forklaringsproblem hver gang de argumenterer på tvers av den.
Koranen, Einar Bergs oversettelse, sure 4:34: ”Menn er kvinners formyndere… rettskafne kvinner skal være lydige…Dem som dere frykter oppsetsighet fra… gi dem stryk…”
Sure 23:1-11: ”De troende går det godt…som holder sitt kjønnsliv i tømme…unntatt når det gjelder hustruer og slavinner, for da kan de ikke lastes.”
To av mange eksempler på en middelalderpraksis som man bør luke ut av Koranen eller stå ved fordi gud har sagt det og best vet hva som er rett.
Jeg antar at Aftenposten hadde hatt vett til å stille utdypende spørsmål hvis kjente nazister hadde demonstrert mot rasisme. Hyklingen kjenner tydelig sine grenser dersom ideologien er politisk-ekstrem, og da spesielt høyreekstrem. Religiøs-ekstreme ideologier som islam slipper av en eller annen grunn unna de fleste legitime spørsmål. Hvis et politisk parti hadde hatt bank av kvinner og voldtekt av slaver på partiprogrammet, så hadde de kanskje måttet svare for seg hver gang de gikk imot eget program?
Vi gjør vårt mulige fellesskap en bjørnetjeneste ved ikke å ha dialog om de ideene som skiller oss aller mest. Og hvor lenge tror papirmedia at de som har et kritisk syn vil fortsette å kjøpe aviser dersom avisene ikke lenger oppfattes som relevante premissleverandører? Hvis de lar ”antirasistenes” brunpensel male over alle legitime spørsmål? Da kan det snart bli flere arbeidsledige journalister!
Sindre Rudshaug
Ingen finner mer olje og gass enn Norge
Rosenborg med målskrekk
Avslørte bin Laden – må i fengsel
Lesernes kommentarer
Peter Hagen
23. november 2009 - 21:50
Heder til Shohaib Sultan
Bjørn H. Bråthen
24. november 2009 - 10:22
Krisesentra.
Hvorfor hører vi ingenting fra våre poltikere om dette ???
Feigheten eller frykten styrer.
Kjell Tangen
24. november 2009 - 12:18
Hykleriet har mange ansikter.
Eget hykleri forties helt.
Å plukke 2 sitater fra Koranen og framstille det som Islams lære er i høy grad hyklersk og uærlig.
Nå har jeg ikk lest Koranen, men har sett sitater derfra som viser motsatt syn i samme sak.
Samme teknikk er like enkel når det gjelder Bibelen. Det gamle testamentet er fyllt opp med befalinger fra Gud til de tidlige israelitter om å massakrere og utrydde folk, også kvinner og barn. Det er grundige beskriveser av hvilke straffer som gjelder når det gjelder skade eller drap, alt etter om det er frie mennesker eller slaver, menn eller kvinner som er skadet/drept.
Å profilere kvinnesynet er også hyklersk. Det er blitt slik her i Norge at vi har kvinnelige prester og biskoper, men det er en utvikling som er påtvunget Den norske kirke av politikerene.
Da Ingrid Bjerkås ble nominert som første kvinnelige prest i 1961 var protestene fra kirkelig hold mange og svært sterke. Bare 1 biskop Kristian Schjelderup var villig til å foreta ordinasjonen og 6 av biskoper boikottet sermonien. Det hyppigste argumentet var et bibelsitat fra Pualus: "Kvinner skal tie i forsamlinger." Dette avslører Bibelens og kirkens kvinnesyn. Da Rosemarie Køhn ble første kvinnelige biskop i 1993 var også protestene innen kirken mange og sterke, flere prester nektet å godta kvinnelige overhoder og selv i dag finnes enkelte prester innen kirken med samme syn.
I frikirkelige menigheter er dette synet enda tydligere. Flere av disse godtar ikke kvinnelige forkynnere og noen heller ikke at kviner kan inneha styremedlemskap. Selv blant unge medlemmer er holdningen at det er mannen som skal bestemme i ekteskapet.
Når Rudshaug trekker inn nazisme og bruker ”antirasistenes” brunpensel som som begrep er det både hyklersk og historieløst. Politisk er brunfarge en karakteristikk på nazisme.
Nazismen kjennetegn når det gjelder inndeling av folkegrupper er klart og tidelig rasistisk. Å hevde at "antirasister" er rasister er direkte absurd selv med bruken av anførselstegn.
Dersom 2 bevisst utplukkede sitater fra Koranen kan sies å vise Islams syn, kan det samme sies om de eksempler jeg har lagt fram om Bibelens og Kristendommens egentlige holdninger til kvinnens rolle.
Sindre Rudshaug
25. november 2009 - 14:44
Sensur
Hilsen en skuffet, men ikke overrasket Sindre!
O Korsnes
25. november 2009 - 22:15
Utdanning
"De som tror, menn og kvinner, er formyndere for hverandre, de forordner det rette og forbyr det urette." (9,67) Menn og kvinner er likverdige."
Da er det jo sagt at det ikke skal være forskjell på menn og kvinner
Først og fremst er det viktig å differensiere mellom kvinnens status i islam og dagens staus i den muslimske verden.Blandt verdens 1,5milliarder muslimer,så er det forskjell fra kultur til kultur,til og med forskjell i samme kultur,den stereoetype oppfatning av den undertrykkte muslimske kvinne med begrenset eller ingen tilgang til utdannelse er en stereotype som er basert på feilinformasjon.Det å begrense kvinnens tilgang til høyere utdanning,enten åpent eller ved en taktisk diskriminasjon,som det blir gjort i enkelte land,er et overgrep mot den islamske lære og ikke noe som står skal gjøres i koranen.Slike ting som æresdrap,vold i hjemmet og andre overgrep mot kvinner som eksisterer i muslimske og ikke muslimske kulturer.Det er helt imot det som er det muslimske konseptet av rettferdighet mot kvinner,det er ett grovt overtramp for kvinners makt
Her er hele verset du tok fra;
34 Menn er kvinners formyndere på grunn av det som Gud har utstyrt noen av dere med fremfor andre, og på grunn av de utgifter de bærer. Derfor skal rettskafne kvinner være lydige og bevare det som er hemmelig, fordi Gud ønsker det bevart. Dem som dere frykter oppsetsighet fra, skal dere formane, gå ikke til sengs med dem og gi dem stryk. Hvis de så er lydige, så forfølg ikke saken. Gud er opphøyet, stor.
tror det er mye feiltolkninger og synsing fra oss her i vest når det gjelder koranen,ting blir tatt helt ut av sammenheng,slik man også kan gjøre med bibelsitater,ikke minst fra gamle testamentet,der er det jo nesten helt perverst med drepning av barn og gamle,koking og spising av egne barn,perverse ting som ikke hører noen steds hjemme egentlig
Sindre Rudshaug
26. november 2009 - 16:35
Noe å tygge på!
Mye av grunnlaget for at det er mulig å mistolke islam til å være en fredens religion ligger i Muhammeds etablering av dualisme: http://sindrerudshaug.vgb.no/2009/10/14/muhammed-og-dualismen-politisk-islam-leksjon-3/
Jeg hadde plukket to ut av svært mange sitater. Hvis man leser i islams grunntekster, Koranen, Sira og Hadith finner man ut at Muhammed hadde mange ulike menneskelige kvaliteter som:
Pedofil: http://sindrerudshaug.vgb.no/2009/11/10/islam-og-sex-med-barn/
Slavehandler(Kjøp, salg, utleie): http://sindrerudshaug.vgb.no/2009/11/17/islam-og-slaveri-politisk-islam-leksjon-6-del-12/
http://sindrerudshaug.vgb.no/2009/11/18/islam-og-slaveri-politisk-islam-leksjon-6-del-22/
Raner, massemorder: http://sindrerudshaug.vgb.no/2009/11/20/fakta-3-muhammeds-mange-kriger/
Rasist: http://sindrerudshaug.vgb.no/2009/11/03/j%C3%B8dene-under-islam-politisk-islam-leksjon-5/
Voldtektsforbryter: http://sindrerudshaug.vgb.no/2009/11/01/islam-og-voldtekt/
Voldelig spredning av islam gjennom jihad: http://sindrerudshaug.vgb.no/2009/10/23/jihad-politisk-islam-leksjon-4/
Uten vansker finner vi ytterligere hundrevis av koranvers og vers i Sira og Hadith som på en naturlig måte fremstiller Muhammed som
Hevngjerrig
Ond
Følelsesløs
Løgnaktig
Historieforfalsker
Legger ved et vers fra Hadith:
Volume 3, Book 34, Number 432: Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri:
..that while he was sitting with Allah’s Apostle he said, “O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interrupt us?” The Prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to do it. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.
En enkel forklaring fra profeten Muhammed når hans menn søker veiledning i hvordan å unngå prisfall ved voldtekt av kafir/vantro jenter!
Etter å ha lest og lært om Muhammed lurer jeg på hvorfor muslimer velger å underkaste seg denne mannen. Er ikke det et naturlig spørsmål når det i islamske grunntekster helt tydelig kommer frem hva Muhammed har gjort? Muhammed er eksempelet til etterfølgelse for alle muslimer i all fremtid, han var den muslim som dyrket islam perfekt. Han er alle muslimers ledestjerne. Hvordan kan dette henge sammen? Har muslimer kunnskap om dette eller bør vi kanskje informere om dette?
I kirken må kvinnen kanskje tie i forsamlingen. I islam, som jeg har dokumentert, kan kvinner voldtaes, brukes som sexleketøy, sperres inne på livstid hvis de er “moralsk fordervet”, piskes, bankes og så er de generelt lite verdt.
Godt at man tar avstand fra rasismen i nazisme, men hva med rasismen i islam?
Hvorfor er det historieløst å snakke om at “antirasister” konsekvent forsøker å kneble meningsmotstandere ved å dra frem brunpenselen for å antyde at de er rasister, fascister, nazister og verre når vi i realiteten ønsker å motarbeide det vi oppfatter som en ekstremt fascistisk og rasistisk ideologi? Det henger ikke på greip! Vår kamp er mot islam, ikke mot muslimer eller muslimsk kultur som ikke begrenser andres frihet.
Jeg oppfatter forskjeller mellom kristendommen gjennom Det Nye Testamente og islam gjennom sine grunntekster. Reiser det seg ikke naturlig noen spørsmål om menneskesyn dersom man underkaster seg islams grunntekster eller Gamletestamentet? Jeg kan med hånden på hjertet si at jeg ikke har hørt noen påstå på en stund at Gamletestamentet er guds lov, ord for ord. Du finner ikke en muslim som sier at Koranen IKKE er guds lov, ord for ord. Hvordan kan en gud tillate å holde kvinner som slaver til seksuell forlystelse?(Einar Berg 23:1-6) Husk at Koranen ikke skal tolkes verken samfunnsmessig eller historisk.
For ytterligere lesning som ikke er sterkt farget av politisk korrekt fortielse:
Koranen og Hadith på nett: http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/
Et meget godt intervju med Bill Warner om politisk islam: http://97.74.65.51/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=297
Anbefalte bøker fra CSPI publishing for å forstå politisk islam(høyre side av dok.):
http://www.cspipublishing.com/
Les, lær og kom tilbake for ytterligere debatt!
Mvh Sindre
O Korsnes
26. november 2009 - 18:49
Men...
The theory of Islam and Sword for instance is not heard now frequently in any quarter worth the name. The principle of Islam that there is no compulsion in religion is well known. Gibbon, a historian of world repute says, "A pernicious tenet has been imputed to Mohammadans, the duty of extirpating all the religions by sword." This charge based on ignorance and bigotry, says the eminent historian, is refuted by Quran, by history of Musalman conquerors and by their public and legal toleration of Christian worship. The great success of Mohammad's life had been effected by sheer moral force, without a stroke of sword.
But in pure self-defense, after repeated efforts of conciliation had utterly failed, circumstances dragged him into the battlefield. But the prophet of Islam changed the whole strategy of the battlefield. The total number of casualties in all the wars that took place during his lifetime when the whole Arabian Peninsula came under his banner, does not exceed a few hundreds in all. But even on the battlefield he taught the Arab barbarians to pray, to pray not individually, but in congregation to God the Almighty. During the dust and storm of warfare whenever the time for prayer came, and it comes five times a every day, the congregation prayer had not to be postponed even on the battlefield. A party had to be engaged in bowing their heads before God while other was engaged with the enemy. After finishing the prayers, the two parties had to exchange their positions. To the Arabs, who would fight for forty years on the slight provocation that a camel belonging to the guest of one tribe had strayed into the grazing land belonging to other tribe and both sides had fought till they lost 70,000 lives in all; threatening the extinction of both the tribes to such furious Arabs, the Prophet of Islam taught self-control and discipline to the extent of praying even on the battlefield. In an aged of barbarism, the Battlefield itself was humanized and strict instructions were issued not to cheat, not to break trust, not to mutilate, not to kill a child or woman or an old man, not to hew down date palm nor burn it, not to cut a fruit tree, not to molest any person engaged in worship. His own treatment with his bitterest enemies is the noblest example for his followers. At the conquest of Mecca, he stood at the zenith of his power. The city which had refused to listen to his mission, which had tortured him and his followers, which had driven him and his people into exile and which had unrelentingly persecuted and boycotted him even when he had taken refuge in a place more than 200 miles away, that city now lay at his feet. By the laws of war he could have justly avenged all the cruelties inflicted on him and his people. But what treatment did he accord to them? Mohammad's heart flowed with affection and he declared, "This day, there is no REPROOF against you and you are all free." "This day" he proclaimed, "I trample under my feet all distinctions between man and man, all hatred between man and man."
This was one of the chief objects why he permitted war in self defense, that is to unite human beings. And when once this object was achieved, even his worst enemies were pardoned. Even those who killed his beloved uncle, Hamazah, mangled his body, ripped it open, even chewed a piece of his liver.
The principles of universal brotherhood and doctrine of the equality of mankind which he proclaimed represents one very great contribution of Mohammad to the social uplift of humanity. All great religions have preached the same doctrine but the prophet of Islam had put this theory into actual practice and its value will be fully recognized, perhaps centuries hence, when international consciousness being awakened, racial prejudices may disappear and greater brotherhood of humanity come into existence.
Alle disse strenge slagmarkreglene ble også senere fulgt av Salaheddine i kampene mot korsfarerne.Salaheddine var vel en av de,om kanskje den eneste,krigeren som noblessen i europa virkelig hadde respekt for pga hans nobelhet i kamp,hadde han lovet noe ,så ble det holdt.Dette var det jo Muhammed som innførte,noe du leste om lenger oppe,så at han bare var barbarisk som du vil frem til,faller på sin egen urimelighet egentlig
At de fikk lov til å ha sex med sine koner og slavinner var nok ganske normalt over helle verden på den tiden.Tror du vikingene hadde bedre oppførsel mot sine trelle kvinner her på berget,de holdt det jo da innen familien hvis en skal se litt stort på det
Sindre Rudshaug
26. november 2009 - 19:43
Ikke noe "men...":)
Historikere regner med at islam har drept ca 270 millioner mennesker fra Muhammed til idag. Bare i løpet av en eneste dag satt Muhammed og lot seg underholde av at 800 jøder ble halshugget på torget, så han fyren du henviser til mister troverdighet når han hevder at det alt i alt i Muhammeds karriere som voldsmann ble drept bare noen få hundre. Har du selv sjekket islams grunntekster? Historiene står der for alle å lese. Norske anerkjente(av venstresiden) islamforskere skriver stort sett utelukkende pent om islam. De skriver ikke om islams slaverihistorie eller 270 millioner drepte under islam. At fyren ikke er muslim spiller liten rolle. Bare det faktum at han ikke har undersøkt islams egne grunntekster, der det tydelig kommer frem at Muhammeds mange kriger var angrepskriger sier sitt om fyren din. Muhammeds egne menn likte ikke at Muhammed hadde gitt ordre om å angripe på en hellig dag eller på et hellig sted. Men Allah reddet alltid Muhammed ut av kinkige situasjoner der Muhammed endret spillereglene. Flaks!
Ingen tvang i islam? Hvis du innser at islam er en dualistisk religion, så er det både riktig og feil at det ikke er tvang i religionen. Et vers i Koranen sier at det ikke er tvang i religionen, her kan du lese det motsatte:
Forced conversion and/or submission in Islam
[Quran 9:5, Yusuf Ali translation] But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.
[Quran 9:29, Yusuf Ali translation] Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
[Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 2, Number 24] Narrated Ibn 'Umar: Allah's Apostle said: "I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah's Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform a that, then they save their lives an property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (accounts) will be done by Allah." [Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387] Narrated Anas bin Malik: Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."
[Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 643] Narrated Qais: Jarir said "Allah's Apostle said to me, "Won't you relieve me from Dhul-Khalasa?" I replied, "Yes, (I will relieve you)." So I proceeded along with one-hundred and fifty cavalry from Ahmas tribe who were skillful in riding horses. I used not to sit firm over horses, so I informed the Prophet of that, and he stroke my chest with his hand till I saw the marks of his hand over my chest and he said, O Allah! Make him firm and one who guides others and is guided (on the right path).' Since then I have never fallen from a horse. Dhul-l--Khulasa was a house in Yemen belonging to the tribe of Khatham and Bajaila, and in it there were idols which were worshipped, and it was called Al-Ka'ba." Jarir went there, burnt it with fire and dismantled it. When Jarir reached Yemen, there was a man who used to foretell and give good omens by casting arrows of divination. Someone said to him. "The messenger of Allah's Apostle is present here and if he should get hold of you, he would chop off your neck." One day while he was using them (i.e. arrows of divination), Jarir stopped there and said to him, "Break them (i.e. the arrows) and testify that None has the right to be worshipped except Allah, or else I will chop off your neck." So the man broke those arrows and testified that none has the right to be worshipped except Allah. Then Jarir sent a man called Abu Artata from the tribe of Ahmas to the Prophet to convey the good news (of destroying Dhu-l-Khalasa). So when the messenger reached the Prophet, he said, "O Allah's Apostle! By Him Who sent you with the Truth, I did not leave it till it was like a scabby camel." Then the Prophet blessed the horses of Ahmas and their men five times.
[Sahih Muslim, Book 1, Number 29] It is narrated on the authority of Abu Huraira that when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) breathed his last and Abu Bakr was appointed as his successor (Caliph), those amongst the Arabs who wanted to become apostates became apostates. 'Umar b. Khattab said to Abu Bakr: Why would you fight against the people, when the Messenger of Allah declared: I have been directed to fight against people so long as they do not say: There is no god but Allah, and he who professed it was granted full protection of his property and life on my behalf except for a right? His (other) affairs rest with Allah. Upon this Abu Bakr said: By Allah, I would definitely fight against him who severed prayer from Zakat, for it is the obligation upon the rich. By Allah, I would fight against them even to secure the cord (used for hobbling the feet of a camel) which they used to give to the Messenger of Allah (as zakat) but now they have withheld it. Umar b. Khattab remarked: By Allah, I found nothing but the fact that Allah had opened the heart of Abu Bakr for (perceiving the justification of) fighting (against those who refused to pay Zakat) and I fully recognized that the (stand of Abu Bakr) was right.
[Sahih Muslim, Book 1, Number 30] It is reported on the authority of Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah, and he who professed it was guaranteed the protection of his property and life on my behalf except for the right affairs rest with Allah.
[Sahih Muslim, Book 1, Number 31] It is reported on the authority of Abu Huraira that he heard the Messenger of Allah say: I have been commanded to fight against people, till they testify to the fact that there is no god but Allah, and believe in me (that) I am the messenger (from the Lord) and in all that I have brought. And when they do it, their blood and riches are guaranteed protection on my behalf except where it is justified by law, and their affairs rest with Allah.
[Sahih Muslim, Book 1, Number 32] It is narrated on the authority of Jabir that the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded that I should fight against people till they declare that there is no god but Allah, and when they profess it that there is no god but Allah, their blood and riches are guaranteed protection on my behalf except where it is justified by law, and their affairs rest with Allah, and then he (the Holy Prophet) recited (this verse of the Holy Qur'an):" Thou art not over them a warden" (lxxxviii, 22).
[Sahih Muslim, Book 1, Number 33] It has been narrated on the authority of Abdullah b. 'Umar that the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah, and they establish prayer, and pay Zakat and if they do it, their blood and property are guaranteed protection on my behalf except when justified by law, and their affairs rest with Allah.
[Sahih Muslim, Book 1, Number 34] It Is narrated on the authority of Abu Malik: I heard the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) say: He who professed that there is no god but Allah and made a denial of everything which the people worship beside Allah, his property and blood became inviolable, an their affairs rest with Allah.
[Sahih Muslim, Book 1, Number 35] Abu Malik narrated on the authority of his father that he heard the Apostle (may peace be upon him) say: He who held belief in the unity of Allah, and then narrated what has been stated above.
[Sahih Muslim, Book 19, Number 4294] It has been reported from Sulaiman b. Buraid through his father that when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) appointed anyone as leader of an army or detachment he would especially exhort him to fear Allah and to be good to the Muslims who were with him. He would say: Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war, do not embezzle the spoils; do not break your pledge; and do not mutilate (the dead) bodies; do not kill the children. When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them. Then invite them to migrate from their lands to the land of Muhairs and inform them that, if they do so, they shall have all the privileges and obligations of the Muhajirs. If they refuse to migrate, tell them that they will have the status of Bedouin Muilims and will be subjected to the Commands of Allah like other Muslims, but they will not get any share from the spoils of war or Fai' except when they actually fight with the Muslims (against the disbelievers). If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them. When you lay siege to a fort and the besieged appeal to you for protection in the name of Allah and His Prophet, do not accord to them the guarantee of Allah and His Prophet, but accord to them your own guarantee and the guarantee of your companions for it is a lesser sin that the security given by you or your companions be disregarded than that the security granted in the name of Allah and His Prophet be violated. When you besiege a fort and the besieged want you to let them out in accordance with Allah's Command, do not let them come out in accordance with His Command, but do so at your (own) command, for you do not know whether or not you will be able to carry out Allah's behest with regard to them.
[Sahih Muslim, Book 19, Number 4366] It has been narrated by 'Umar b. al-Khattib that he heard the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) say: I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim.
[Sahih Muslim, Book 31, Number 5917] Suhail reported on the authority of Abu Huraira that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said on the Day of Khaibar: I shall certainly give this standard in the hand of one who loves Allah and his Messenger and Allah will grant victory at his hand. Umar b. Khattab said: Never did I cherish for leadership but on that day. I came before him with the hope that I may be called for this, but Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) called 'Ali b. Abu Talib and he conferred (this honour) upon him and said: Proceed on and do not look about until Allah grants you victory, and 'Ali went a bit and then halted and did not look about and then said in a loud voice: Allah's Messenger, on what issue should I fight with the people? Thereupon he (the Prophet) said: Fight with them until they bear testimony to the fact that there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his Messenger, and when they do that then their blood and their riches are inviolable from your hands but what is justified by law and their reckoning is with Allah.
[Sahih Muslim, Book 31, Number 5918] Sahl b. Sa'd reported that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said on the Day of Khaibar: I would certainly give this standard to a person at whose hand Allah would grant victory and who loves Allah and His Messenger and Allah and His Messenger love him also. The people spent the night thinking as to whom it would be given. When it was morning the people hastened to Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) all of them hoping that that would be given to him. He (the Holy Prophet) said: Where is 'Ali b. Abu Talib? They said: Allah's Messenger, his eyes are sore. He then sent for him and he was brought and Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) applied saliva to his eyes and invoked blessings and he was all right, as if he had no ailment at all, and coraferred upon him the standard. 'Ali said: Allah's Messenger, I will fight them until they are like us. Thereupon he (the Holy Prophet) said: Advance cautiously until you reach their open places, thereafter invite them to Islam and inform them what is obligatory for them from the rights of Allah, for, by Allah, if Allah guides aright even one person through you that is better for you than to possess the most valuable of the camels.